|
Shouldn't
our highest priority, after our personal relationship with Jesus, be our
participation as the Bride of Christ; the local Ekklesia, the local
assembly of Believers?
And
shouldn't our priority be to apply everything the New Testament teaches
about being the local assembly of Believers?
Shouldn't
everything else flow from that?
Of course,
when I speak of a local assembly of Christ, I'm not referring to the
institutional organization - business franchise - "church
growth" - Madison Avenue marketing - polished - affectatious -
selling-a-product entity that calls itself a church.
Is there any
commandment in the New Testament to create "para-church"
organizations?
Turning a
relationship with Jesus into a career path in an organization is the kind
of fleshly ambition that causes many of these organizations to exist. The
world of para-churches promotes this kind of worldly thinking: a
corporation, career ladder "vision" for life.
A para-church
organization will always be led by a hierarchical structure and is likely
to be run by a CEO dictator who treats fellow brothers like employees or
his personal staff. Of course, in many cases, since para-churches ARE
businesses, the brothers ARE employees; the CEO has a personal staff.
Most
clergyman, who lead most institutional church systems, cannot operate like
a New Testament leader either. The clergy and the para-church leaders come
out of the same institutional mind-set. The leader as dictator is from the
world. These brothers seem to have no clue that the New Testament teaches
that leaders in the Body of Christ are to be servants, not lords;
examples, not dictators; and fellow brethren, not an elite class over the
rest of us.
The concept
of brothers as fellow elders and fellow decision makers is a foreign
concept to them.
Some
brothers, who have a zeal, might say that the "churches" have
failed to minister and therefore I must step out to do what God has called
me to do.
Does the end
justify the means?
Has not our
Lord Jesus already told us the means He has chosen to pursue His ends?
Has not our
Lord chosen the Ekklesia of Christ?
Does not the
New Testament tell us how the Ekklesia of Christ is to be led and how we
are to function?
Shouldn't
that be more important than evangelism or feeding the poor or
"transforming lives"?
When someone
is converted, are they converted into the Ekklesia of Christ or into the
Parachurch? Do they become disciples of Jesus or of a para-church guru?
I certainly
am not saying that every ministry must be in the context of a program of
an (institutional) church.
The brethren
come together to edify one another. We minister to the Body of Christ
together and as individuals and we minister to the world together and as
individuals.
Why can't we
be co-workers in Christ, submitting one to another?
|